Valuing Real Estate Assets in Bankruptcy: Ethical Considerations and Practical Insights

Real estate bankruptcies present intricate legal and ethical challenges, particularly concerning asset valuation. Accurate valuations are pivotal as they influence negotiations, creditor recoveries, and court proceedings. Ensuring that all parties—attorneys, lenders, property owners, and appraisers—adhere to ethical standards is crucial for maintaining transparency, fairness, and compliance within the bankruptcy process.

The Importance of Valuation in Real Estate Bankruptcy

David Levy, Managing Director for Keen-Summit Capital Partners and Summit Investment Management, notes that valuations play a pivotal role in bankruptcy cases, influencing everything from cash collateral motions to asset sales and plan confirmation. Whether dealing with declining or appreciating property values, parties must navigate competing interests and ethical obligations. Ethics in real estate bankruptcy encompasses adherence to professional obligations, legal requirements, and moral principles to ensure integrity in all dealings. Ethical lapses can lead to significant legal consequences, reputational damage, and financial losses.

Key Ethical Rules Relevant To Real Estate Bankruptcy

Robert Richards, chair of Dentons” Global Restructuring, Insolvency and Bankruptcy practice group, emphasizes that attorneys and valuation professionals must adhere to the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules throughout the valuation process. Several ABA Model Rules are pertinent when navigating real estate bankruptcy cases, including:

• Rule 1.3 (Diligence): Attorneys must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing their clients, ensuring that cases progress efficiently and clients’ interests are adequately pursued. This includes the proper investigation and verification of valuation reports.
   
• Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal): Lawyers are required to ensure that all statements to the court are truthful and complete, avoiding material omissions that could mislead the tribunal. In bankruptcy valuations, attorneys are obligated to provide truthful information and avoid misrepresenting asset values.
   
• Rule 3.4 (Fairness to Opposing Parties and Counsel): Attorneys must not unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or alter, destroy, or conceal material with potential evidentiary value. This requirement includes ensuring transparency and fairness when presenting valuation data in negotiations.
   
• Rule 4.1 (Truthfulness in Statements to Others): In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person.

Valuation Challenges in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Valuation plays a critical role in real estate bankruptcy cases, affecting negotiations, creditor recoveries, and court proceedings. A proper valuation framework helps determine whether secured creditors are adequately protected, ensures that distressed assets are sold at fair market value, and establishes creditor claims appropriately.

Common Valuation Methods

Several methods are used to determine real estate asset values in bankruptcy. Mark Silverman, a partner at Troutman Pepper Locke, highlights the two most common valuation approaches used in bankruptcy cases:

1. Appraisals: A professional opinion of value based on market trends, property conditions, and comparable sales.
    
2. Broker Opinion of Value (BOV): A more market-driven estimate from real estate brokers who understand local conditions.

Valuations should be supported by thorough documentation and clear methodologies to avoid challenges and ensure credibility.

Ethical Considerations in Valuation Practices

Real estate bankruptcies can present various ethical dilemmas related to valuation. Withholding material facts or misrepresenting valuations can lead to legal and reputational consequences. Overstating or understating property values to influence negotiations or court decisions can violate ethical guidelines and legal regulations. Professionals must also be cautious when representing multiple parties with potentially conflicting interests, ensuring that their duties remain aligned with ethical standards.

Transparency in Asset Valuation

Transparency is a fundamental principle in real estate bankruptcy proceedings. All stakeholders, including creditors, courts, and potential buyers, rely on accurate and complete information to make informed decisions. Ethical obligations require full disclosure of all material facts, including pending offers, financial conditions, and market trends. A lack of transparency can lead to mistrust, legal complications, and potential accusations of fraud.

Attorneys and financial advisors must ensure that their clients provide truthful and comprehensive disclosures. This includes being candid about property conditions, occupancy rates, and market comparables. Ethical rules such as ABA Model Rule 3.3 require attorneys to disclose any material information that may impact the court’s decision-making process. Failure to do so can result in sanctions and reputational damage.

Managing Conflicts of Interest

Avoiding conflicts of interest is a prevalent concern in real estate bankruptcy cases, particularly when professionals have relationships with multiple stakeholders. For example, an attorney representing a property owner may have financial ties to other business interests of the client, which could compromise their ability to provide objective advice.

Ethical guidelines emphasize the need for attorneys to avoid representing conflicting interests without full disclosure and informed consent. When conflicts arise, attorneys and financial advisors must take steps to address them appropriately. This may involve withdrawing from representation, seeking independent valuations, or ensuring that their recommendations align with the best interests of creditors and other stakeholders.

Manipulation of Valuation Data

Manipulating property valuation data is an ethical pitfall that can have severe legal and financial consequences. Stakeholders may be tempted to overstate property values to secure more favorable loan terms or misrepresent financial conditions to minimize creditor recoveries. Such practices violate ethical obligations and can lead to litigation or regulatory scrutiny.

Common tactics of valuation manipulation include using inappropriate comparables, omitting key expenses, and inflating projected income. Ethical compliance requires professionals to use reliable valuation methodologies, such as third-party appraisals, BOVs, and comparable sales analysis. ABA Model Rule 4.1 prohibits the making of false or misleading statements, emphasizing the need for honesty in all financial representations.

Regulatory Developments Impacting Valuation Practices

Recent regulatory developments have introduced additional considerations for ethical valuation practices:

• Automated Valuation Models (AVMs): On June 24, 2024, six federal agencies finalized a rule to create safeguards for automated valuation models in the real estate industry. The rule requires companies that utilize AVMs to implement quality control standards to ensure data accuracy, protect against data manipulation, and prevent discriminatory impacts.
   
• Addressing Discrimination in Appraisals: The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) has emphasized the importance of mitigating risks arising from potential discrimination or bias in real estate appraisals. Examiners are encouraged to evaluate appraisal practices to ensure compliance with consumer protection laws and promote credible valuations.

Best Practices for Ethical Compliance in Bankruptcy Valuation

Matt Christensen of Johnson May notes that adhering to best practices can ensure ethical and effective valuation processes. To navigate valuation challenges effectively, professionals involved in real estate bankruptcies should adhere to the following best practices:

1. Maintain Transparency: Ensure all stakeholders, including creditors and the court, have access to accurate and complete information.
    
2. Engage Independent Valuations: Avoid conflicts of interest by using reputable third-party appraisers or brokers.
    
3. Document Communications: Keep records of all discussions and disclosures to prevent disputes over what was shared.
    
4. Adhere to Fiduciary Responsibilities: Focus on acting in the best interests of creditors when insolvency is a factor.
    
5. Understand the Legal Implications: Legal counsel should stay updated on ethical obligations and ensure compliance with jurisdiction-specific rules.

Conclusion

Ethical considerations in real estate bankruptcy, particularly regarding asset valuation, are critical to fair and effective resolution processes. Whether representing borrowers, lenders, or stakeholders, professionals must ensure they act with integrity, transparency, and adherence to established legal and ethical guidelines.

To learn more about this topic view Valuing Real Estate Assets. The quoted remarks referenced in this article were made either during this webinar or shortly thereafter during post-webinar interviews with the panelists. Readers may also be interested to read other articles about real estate-focused bankruptcy cases.

This article was originally published on DailyDAC. 

©2025. DailyDAC TM. This article is subject to the disclaimers found here.