The discount brokerage contends that a three-judge panel erred in finding that NAR’s no-commingling rule was not direct evidence of “concerted action” between NAR and Zillow.
Source link
Trending
- Kenzo Spring 2026 Menswear Collection
- XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal
- 10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13
- PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown
- Are You Approachable at Work? Tips for Building Better Connections
- Lung Cancer Doctors, Nurses, Therapists, and More: Your Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Team
- Hurry, Amazon’s Early Prime Day Deals Include 50% Off Top Outdoor Power Equipment
- Microsoft Sued in Manhattan Federal Court for Allegedly Using Pirated Material to Train AI Models | Law.com