Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)

    June 30, 2025

    A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen

    June 30, 2025

    H1 2025 Hacks Hit $2.1B Record, Led by North Korean Actors: Report

    June 30, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)
    • A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen
    • H1 2025 Hacks Hit $2.1B Record, Led by North Korean Actors: Report
    • One of the World’s Largest Alcohol Companies Isn’t Giving Up on Wine
    • SCOTUS Decision on Nationwide Injunctions: Trump v. Casa and Its Impact on Federal Litigation
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)
    • A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen
    • H1 2025 Hacks Hit $2.1B Record, Led by North Korean Actors: Report
    • One of the World’s Largest Alcohol Companies Isn’t Giving Up on Wine
    • SCOTUS Decision on Nationwide Injunctions: Trump v. Casa and Its Impact on Federal Litigation
    • What’s Worse than Lost FBA Inventory? When Amazon Finds It
    • Understanding Small Business Customer Expectations for Success
    • Mastercard Is One of the Largest Financial Companies by Market Cap. But Is It a Buy? | The Motley Fool
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Don’t Give Up on CGL Coverage for ITC Proceedings Alleging Trade Dress Infringement
    Legal

    Don’t Give Up on CGL Coverage for ITC Proceedings Alleging Trade Dress Infringement

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Don’t Give Up on CGL Coverage for ITC Proceedings Alleging Trade Dress Infringement
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Not in our view. In taking the position that ITC proceedings are not covered because they do not seek damages, insurers miss the point.

    Not in our view. In taking the position that ITC proceedings are not covered because they do not seek damages, insurers miss the point.

    Defense costs incurred by policyholders while both a lawsuit and ITC proceedings are pending should be covered under the CGL policies as recoverable defense costs given the the ITC proceeding’s preclusive effect on the associated trade dress litigation.

    When a federal court trade dress infringement suit is brought concurrently with an ITC proceeding that features identical issues of trade dress validity, scope and infringement, the defense of those issues are effectively litigated only once. See 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). 28 U.S.C. § 1659 (“Section 1659”) states in pertinent part:

    (a) STAY.—In a civil action involving parties that are also parties to a proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the request of a party to the civil action that is also a respondent in the proceeding before the Commission, the District Court shall stay, until the determination of the Commission becomes final, proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that involves the same issues involved in the proceeding before the Commission….

    (b) USE OF COMMISSION RECORD.—Notwithstanding section 337(n)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, after dissolution of a stay under subsection (a), the record of the proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission shall be transmitted to the district court and shall be admissible in the civil action…Section 1659 thus allows the accused infringer to defend both the federal action and the ITC proceeding by adjudicating the issue one time and having that determination be binding in both matters. See In re Princo Corp., 478 F.3d 1345, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (“The purpose of §1659 is to prevent separate proceedings on the same issues occurring at the same time. The legislative history states that § 1659 was [enacted]… ‘to address the possibility that infringement proceedings may be brought against imported goods in two forums at the same time.’ H.R. Rep. No. 103-826(I), at 141 (1994), reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3773, 3913.”).

    Following a final determination by the ITC, the entire record of the ITC proceeding is transmitted to the district court to use to resolve the underlying claims for damages. See In re Princo Corp., 478 F.3d at 1355 (“The legislative history explains that ‘use of the Commission record could expedite proceedings and provide useful information to the court.’ H.R. Rep. No. 103-826(1), at 142, reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 3914. The Commission record will be most helpful to the district court if it is a complete record of the Commission proceedings including all remand proceedings.”).

    Furthermore, in non-patent cases like trade dress infringement proceedings, the ITC’s findings and determinations are given preclusive effect—binding the parties in both the federal action and the ITC proceeding. See, e.g., Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. FCA US LLC, 503 F. Supp. 3d 542, 548-55 (E.D. Mich. 2020) (“Mahindra”) (recognizing that ITC proceedings have a preclusive effect on trade dress claims and granting dueling summary judgment motions based solely on the ITC’s findings and determinations). The preclusive effect is not only binding, but also reflects Congressional intent to have certain claims for damages defended only once, even though proceedings are pending in the court and the ITC. See id. at 549-50; see also McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 29.55 (5th Ed. 2023) (“Res judicata from an [ITC] decision may be created so as to bar relitigation of the same claim or issue in a [parallel] federal court case. An [ITC] finding that complainant had no valid trademark was held to be res judicata and precluded the losing complainant from [continuing to pursue] an identical [claim] in district court rather than appealing the ITC decision to the Federal Circuit.”) (citations omitted).

    While no reported California case has addressed the issue, existing California case law supports the proposition that recoverable defense costs include costs incurred after the tender of defense, but before the conclusion of the suit, and which relate to “reasonable and necessary effort[s] to avoid or at least minimize liability.” Aerojet–General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co., 17 Cal.4th 38, 61 (1997).

    In Aerojet, the California Supreme Court evaluated whether the insurers’ duties to defend required them to pay environmental investigation expenses imposed by an administrative order outside of the context of the covered litigation. Id. at 70. The California Supreme Court determined that “the insured’s site investigation expenses constitute defense costs that the insurer must incur in fulfilling its duty to defend” under the following conditions: (1) the site investigation must be conducted within the temporal limits of the insurer”s duty to defend, i.e., between tender of the defense and conclusion of the action; (2) the site investigation must amount to a reasonable and necessary effort to avoid or at least minimize liability; and (3) the site investigation expenses must be reasonable and necessary for that purpose. Id. at 60-61.

    As in Aerojet, defense costs incurred by policyholders while both trade dress litigation and associated ITC proceedings are pending potentially meet all three of these requirements. Specifically, the binding nature of the ITC’s findings and determinations on the validity and scope of any claimed trade dress means that defending these claims before ITC directly benefits the defense in the concurrent court proceedings—making the costs of the ITC defense necessary to “avoid or minimize liability” in the court proceedings.

    Accordingly, policyholders should consider pursuing coverage for ITC proceedings alleging trade dress infringement.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleThe Demand for Pre-Owned Gold Rolexes Is on the Rise
    Next Article What Is a Wet Cough? Causes, Treatment, Prevention, and When to See a Doctor

    Related Posts

    SCOTUS Decision on Nationwide Injunctions: Trump v. Casa and Its Impact on Federal Litigation

    June 30, 2025

    SCOTUS’s CASA Decision Ends Nationwide Injunctions, Creating Uncertainty Around Enforcement of Executive and Agency Actions

    June 29, 2025

    Lawyer Calls Judge ‘Honey’ in Viral Moment | Law.com

    June 28, 2025

    Lawyer Calls Judge ‘Honey’ in Viral Moment | Law.com

    June 28, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Finance & Investment
    2 Mins Read

    The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)

    This article was written byFollowMoretus Research delivers state-of-the-art, buy-side quality equity research for serious investors…

    A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen

    June 30, 2025

    H1 2025 Hacks Hit $2.1B Record, Led by North Korean Actors: Report

    June 30, 2025

    One of the World’s Largest Alcohol Companies Isn’t Giving Up on Wine

    June 30, 2025
    Top
    Finance & Investment
    2 Mins Read

    The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)

    This article was written byFollowMoretus Research delivers state-of-the-art, buy-side quality equity research for serious investors…

    A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen

    June 30, 2025

    H1 2025 Hacks Hit $2.1B Record, Led by North Korean Actors: Report

    June 30, 2025
    Our Picks
    Finance & Investment
    2 Mins Read

    The Trade Desk: Strong Buy On Kokai’s Transformative Impact (NASDAQ:TTD)

    This article was written byFollowMoretus Research delivers state-of-the-art, buy-side quality equity research for serious investors…

    Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    3 Mins Read

    A NYC Heat Wave and 100+ Degrees In Vegas Were No Match for This Tinted Sunscreen

    Admittedly, I don’t apply sunscreen enough. I always thought my skin was invincible to the…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version