Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%

    June 9, 2025

    Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead

    June 9, 2025

    How to get the most out of Google’s free AI Studio

    June 9, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • 2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%
    • Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead
    • How to get the most out of Google’s free AI Studio
    • Report: Shein and Reliance Doubling Down on India-made Fashion
    • How customer-centric is your packaging?
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • 2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%
    • Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead
    • How to get the most out of Google’s free AI Studio
    • Report: Shein and Reliance Doubling Down on India-made Fashion
    • How customer-centric is your packaging?
    • 3 Top Energy Stocks to Buy Without Hesitation in June | The Motley Fool
    • The best gaming mouse in 2025
    • Adam Lippes Resort 2026 Collection
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender service members from the military
    Legal

    Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender service members from the military

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender service members from the military
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on Thursday morning, asking the justices to allow it to enforce a 2025 Department of Defense policy prohibiting individuals who are transgender from serving in the U.S. military. On March 27, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle prohibited the government from enforcing its policy anywhere in the United States. 

    Shortly after U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer filed his request with the court, the justices instructed lawyers representing the challengers to file their response by Thursday, May 1, at 5 p.m.

    On Jan. 20, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that revoked an order by then-President Joe Biden that had allowed transgender members of the armed forces to serve openly. Soon after that, Trump issued another order that required Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to implement a ban on “individuals with gender dysphoria” – that is, psychological distress caused by a conflict between the sex someone is assigned at birth and that person’s gender identity. 

    In February, the Department of Defense issued a policy that, subject to narrow exceptions, disqualifies anyone who has gender dysphoria or has undergone medical interventions to treat gender dysphoria from serving in the military. 

    The individual plaintiffs are seven current members of the armed forces, all of whom are transgender, and a transgender person who would like to join the military. The lead plaintiff, Commander Emily Shilling, has been a naval aviator for 19 years, during which she has flown more than 60 combat missions and was a Navy test pilot. She contends that the Navy has spent $20 million on her training. She transitioned beginning in the fall of 2021. 

    The plaintiffs went to federal court to challenge that policy, arguing that it violated (among other things) the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. 

    Settle agreed with them, calling the policy a “de facto blanket prohibition on transgender service.” 

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit declined to put the district court’s order on hold while the government appealed. 

    Contending that Settle’s order had appropriated the executive branch’s “authority to determine who may serve in the Nation’s armed forces,” Sauer on Thursday asked the justices to put Settle’s order on hold while the litigation continues in the court of appeals and (if necessary) the Supreme Court. 

    Sauer emphasized that during the first Trump administration, an expert panel had concluded that allowing individuals with gender dysphoria to serve in the armed forces would be “contrary to ‘military effectiveness and lethality.’” And although the Supreme Court has made clear that “professional military judgments about the composition of the armed forces should be given ‘great deference,’” Sauer stressed, Settle nonetheless barred the government from implementing the 2025 policy anywhere in the United States. 

    The policy, Sauer explained, simply draws distinctions based on a medical condition, gender dysphoria, and treatments related to that condition, rather than gender identity. It is therefore subject to the least stringent constitutional test, known as rational-basis review. And it can easily meet that standard: The government, Sauer wrote, “has undisputedly important interests in maintaining military readiness, cohesion, good order, and discipline, as well as in managing the military’s costs” – and the policy is rationally related to achieving those interests. 

    Moreover, Sauer continued, in 2019, the Supreme Court had allowed the first Trump administration to enforce a policy “materially indistinguishable from the one at issue here.” 

    Sauer continued the Trump administration’s campaign against so-called “universal” or nationwide injunctions, arguing (among other things) that they exceed the power of federal courts by effectively authorizing those courts to supervise the acts of another branch of government. More broadly, Sauer added, they “cause significant harm to the government” – by, for example, encouraging forum-shopping and requiring the government to immediately appeal each decision against it. “At minimum,” Sauer concluded, the Supreme Court should narrow the scope of Settle’s order so that it “blocks the implementation of the 2025 policy only as to the eight individual respondents in this case.” 

    Posted in Emergency appeals and applications, Featured

    Cases: United States v. Shilling

    Recommended Citation:
    Amy Howe,
    Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender service members from the military,
    SCOTUSblog (Apr. 24, 2025, 2:21 PM),
    https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-allow-ban-on-transgender-service-members-from-the-military/



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleNormal Respiratory Rate: What Affects Your Breathing Rate, and When Should You Worry?
    Next Article CMS (CMS) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool

    Related Posts

    NY Attorney General Secures Over $3.2M from Nissan Dealers for Allegedly Cheating Consumers

    June 9, 2025

    Federal Court Upholds SEC Regulations From First Trump Administration That Discourage Activist (ESG) Investors

    June 8, 2025

    Supreme Court adds four new cases to 2025-26 docket

    June 7, 2025

    Coinbase Beats Antitrust Lawsuit Over wBTC Delisting in California Court

    June 7, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    1 Min Read

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6% Source link

    Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead

    June 9, 2025

    How to get the most out of Google’s free AI Studio

    June 9, 2025

    Report: Shein and Reliance Doubling Down on India-made Fashion

    June 9, 2025
    Top
    1 Min Read

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6% Source link

    Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead

    June 9, 2025

    How to get the most out of Google’s free AI Studio

    June 9, 2025
    Our Picks
    1 Min Read

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6%

    2 Steady Dividends To Sleep Well At Night, Yields Up To 6% Source link

    Home Improvement & Remodeling
    4 Mins Read

    Do Dryer Sheets Repel Mice? We Asked a Pest Expert What They Recommend Instead

    Key Points Dryer sheets don’t reliably repel mice—think of them as weak deterrents, not real…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version