Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)

    July 29, 2025

    Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool

    July 29, 2025

    What Is a Training and Development Certificate?

    July 29, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)
    • Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool
    • What Is a Training and Development Certificate?
    • Why Jesse McBee Was Hesitant To Ask Alli for a Prenup With “$50M Payout” at Stake (EXCLUSIVE) | Bravo
    • Bitcoin Rejected At $120,000: Binance Whale Inflows Suggest Possible Drop To $110,000
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)
    • Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool
    • What Is a Training and Development Certificate?
    • Why Jesse McBee Was Hesitant To Ask Alli for a Prenup With “$50M Payout” at Stake (EXCLUSIVE) | Bravo
    • Bitcoin Rejected At $120,000: Binance Whale Inflows Suggest Possible Drop To $110,000
    • I Swear By the $10 Pain Relief Gel Shoppers Say Makes Aches and Soreness ‘Disappear’
    • The first company to complete a fully successful lunar landing is going public
    • We Swept Up 3 Weeks’ Worth of Debris to Find the 7 Best Brooms 
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today
    Legal

    Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The most anticipated event at the U.S. Supreme Court today was the oral argument in the birthright citizenship case.

    While the question of birthright citizenship, which the Romans called jus soli, is important both in terms of constitutional law and American customs and mores, the underlying question in the case raises a procedural issue that will affect the litigators who follow this blog the most.

    That is the question of whether cases involving injunctive or declaratory relief should be resolved by the issuance of nationwide injunctions and orders or just be limited to the actual parties and the district in which the case is at bar. The consolidated cases currently before the Court could be decided expeditiously. In any event, we shall follow developments closely and report promptly when a decision is issued.

    For today, only one decision was forthcoming, with Justice Kagan writing for a unanimous Court in Barnes v. Felix, a not-insignificant case that reads like a law school exercise, but a very vivid and immediate one. Law enforcement officer Roberto Felix, Jr., pulled Ashtian Barnes over for suspected toll violations. Barnes ignored the officer’s order to exit the vehicle and began to drive away. Felix immediately jumped onto the doorsill and fired two shots into the car, fatally wounding Barnes, who was able to stop the car before he died. The entire encounter took five seconds, and only two seconds elapsed from the time the officer stepped onto the doorsill of the car until he fired.

    On her son’s behalf, Barnes’s mother sued Felix, alleging that Felix had used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. In granting and upholding summary judgment in favor of Felix, the trial court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit applied the “moment of threat” rule, which asks only if the officer was “in danger at the moment of the threat that resulted in [his] use of deadly force.” That rule renders irrelevant the examination of the events preceding the shooting. Because Felix reasonably could have believed that his life was in danger at the critical moment, the shooting was held to be lawful.

    However, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the Fifth Circuit’s judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in what, I respectfully suggest, was a reasonable, thoughtful, and well-written opinion by Justice Kagan, whose writing is generally down-to-earth and direct.

    The Court’s opinion begins with the recognition that there is no “easy-to-apply legal test” or “on/off switch” in this analysis. “Rather, the Fourth Amendment requires . . . that a court ‘slosh [its] way through’ a ‘factbound morass.’” Having done considerable sloshing, the Court held that a claim of excessive force during a stop or arrest is analyzed under the Fourth Amendment to establish whether the force applied was objectively reasonable from “the perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene.” In turn, this requires analyzing the “totality of the circumstances.”

    But, contrary to the lower courts, the Supreme Court noted that the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no time limit. “While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones. Prior events”—such as the nature of the crime or warnings given to the suspect— “may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous.”

    In the post-George Floyd times of fractious controversies over police confrontations with citizens, today’s decision demonstrates that all the Justices recognize the difficulty in recreating the conditions that have led to a police shooting and the mindsets and actions of both officers and suspects. The resolution of this case sensibly requires that analyzing “facts and circumstances” means considering all the facts and circumstances, beyond just the moment in which deadly force is employed.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleTikTok will try to force teens to meditate after 10PM
    Next Article Wisconsin Investment Board sold off its Bitcoin ETF stash

    Related Posts

    Pitt Law Professor Sues University, Colleague Over Sexual Misconduct Allegations | Law.com

    July 29, 2025

    Overcomplicating Overtime: How Employers Need to Assess the One Big Beautiful Bill’s Overtime Tax Changes

    July 29, 2025

    The shadows of the emergency docket

    July 28, 2025

    Legal Ethics Roundup: Unethical Hiding Of ICE Lawyer Names In Public Hearings, 50-State Survey Of Judicial Disclosures, DOJ Appeals Jenner EO Block, Judge Scraps Opinion With Fake Cites & More – Above the Law

    July 28, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    2 Mins Read

    Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)

    TL;DR After skyrocketing past its old all-time high at $3.4 about ten days ago, Ripple’s…

    Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool

    July 29, 2025

    What Is a Training and Development Certificate?

    July 29, 2025

    Why Jesse McBee Was Hesitant To Ask Alli for a Prenup With “$50M Payout” at Stake (EXCLUSIVE) | Bravo

    July 29, 2025
    Top
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    2 Mins Read

    Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)

    TL;DR After skyrocketing past its old all-time high at $3.4 about ten days ago, Ripple’s…

    Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool

    July 29, 2025

    What Is a Training and Development Certificate?

    July 29, 2025
    Our Picks
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    2 Mins Read

    Before You Buy the XRP Dip, Watch for This Key Trigger (Analyst)

    TL;DR After skyrocketing past its old all-time high at $3.4 about ten days ago, Ripple’s…

    Finance & Investment
    5 Mins Read

    Cincinnati EPS Jumps 53 Percent in Q2 | The Motley Fool

    Cincinnati Financial (CINF -1.54%), an insurance company specializing in property, casualty, and life insurance, reported…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version