Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal

    June 28, 2025

    10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13

    June 28, 2025

    PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown

    June 28, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal
    • 10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13
    • PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown
    • Are You Approachable at Work? Tips for Building Better Connections
    • Microsoft Sued in Manhattan Federal Court for Allegedly Using Pirated Material to Train AI Models | Law.com
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal
    • 10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13
    • PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown
    • Are You Approachable at Work? Tips for Building Better Connections
    • Microsoft Sued in Manhattan Federal Court for Allegedly Using Pirated Material to Train AI Models | Law.com
    • Baglietto and Meyer Davis Just Teamed up on a Sleek 183-Foot Superyacht
    • Trump Thinks Reporting The Truth Is A Punishable Offense – See Also – Above the Law
    • SCOTUS upholds part of ACA that makes preventive care fully covered
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today
    Legal

    Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case – SCOTUS Today
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The most anticipated event at the U.S. Supreme Court today was the oral argument in the birthright citizenship case.

    While the question of birthright citizenship, which the Romans called jus soli, is important both in terms of constitutional law and American customs and mores, the underlying question in the case raises a procedural issue that will affect the litigators who follow this blog the most.

    That is the question of whether cases involving injunctive or declaratory relief should be resolved by the issuance of nationwide injunctions and orders or just be limited to the actual parties and the district in which the case is at bar. The consolidated cases currently before the Court could be decided expeditiously. In any event, we shall follow developments closely and report promptly when a decision is issued.

    For today, only one decision was forthcoming, with Justice Kagan writing for a unanimous Court in Barnes v. Felix, a not-insignificant case that reads like a law school exercise, but a very vivid and immediate one. Law enforcement officer Roberto Felix, Jr., pulled Ashtian Barnes over for suspected toll violations. Barnes ignored the officer’s order to exit the vehicle and began to drive away. Felix immediately jumped onto the doorsill and fired two shots into the car, fatally wounding Barnes, who was able to stop the car before he died. The entire encounter took five seconds, and only two seconds elapsed from the time the officer stepped onto the doorsill of the car until he fired.

    On her son’s behalf, Barnes’s mother sued Felix, alleging that Felix had used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. In granting and upholding summary judgment in favor of Felix, the trial court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit applied the “moment of threat” rule, which asks only if the officer was “in danger at the moment of the threat that resulted in [his] use of deadly force.” That rule renders irrelevant the examination of the events preceding the shooting. Because Felix reasonably could have believed that his life was in danger at the critical moment, the shooting was held to be lawful.

    However, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the Fifth Circuit’s judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in what, I respectfully suggest, was a reasonable, thoughtful, and well-written opinion by Justice Kagan, whose writing is generally down-to-earth and direct.

    The Court’s opinion begins with the recognition that there is no “easy-to-apply legal test” or “on/off switch” in this analysis. “Rather, the Fourth Amendment requires . . . that a court ‘slosh [its] way through’ a ‘factbound morass.’” Having done considerable sloshing, the Court held that a claim of excessive force during a stop or arrest is analyzed under the Fourth Amendment to establish whether the force applied was objectively reasonable from “the perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene.” In turn, this requires analyzing the “totality of the circumstances.”

    But, contrary to the lower courts, the Supreme Court noted that the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no time limit. “While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones. Prior events”—such as the nature of the crime or warnings given to the suspect— “may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous.”

    In the post-George Floyd times of fractious controversies over police confrontations with citizens, today’s decision demonstrates that all the Justices recognize the difficulty in recreating the conditions that have led to a police shooting and the mindsets and actions of both officers and suspects. The resolution of this case sensibly requires that analyzing “facts and circumstances” means considering all the facts and circumstances, beyond just the moment in which deadly force is employed.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleTikTok will try to force teens to meditate after 10PM
    Next Article Wisconsin Investment Board sold off its Bitcoin ETF stash

    Related Posts

    Microsoft Sued in Manhattan Federal Court for Allegedly Using Pirated Material to Train AI Models | Law.com

    June 28, 2025

    Trump Thinks Reporting The Truth Is A Punishable Offense – See Also – Above the Law

    June 28, 2025

    Attorneys General Respond to Key U.S. Supreme Court Decisions | Law.com

    June 28, 2025

    The morning read for Friday, June 27

    June 27, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    3 Mins Read

    XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal

    XRP’s price jumped over 3% on Friday just hours after Ripple Labs CEO Brad Garlinghouse…

    10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13

    June 28, 2025

    PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown

    June 28, 2025

    Are You Approachable at Work? Tips for Building Better Connections

    June 28, 2025
    Top
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    3 Mins Read

    XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal

    XRP’s price jumped over 3% on Friday just hours after Ripple Labs CEO Brad Garlinghouse…

    10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13

    June 28, 2025

    PwC to cut 175 junior auditors amid slowdown

    June 28, 2025
    Our Picks
    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    3 Mins Read

    XRP spikes 3% after Garlinghouse says Ripple dropping SEC cross-appeal

    XRP’s price jumped over 3% on Friday just hours after Ripple Labs CEO Brad Garlinghouse…

    Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    8 Mins Read

    10 Outdated Travel Items It’s Time to Toss—and What to Replace Them With, From $13

    f you’ve been traveling for years now, there’s a good chance you’ve built up a…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version