Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million

    June 23, 2025

    Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?

    June 23, 2025

    This Waffle House Video Parody Nails 4 Keys to Great Employee Training. Here’s Why

    June 23, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million
    • Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?
    • This Waffle House Video Parody Nails 4 Keys to Great Employee Training. Here’s Why
    • Michael Saylor’s Strategy makes smallest Bitcoin purchase since mid-March
    • 5 Fastest-Charging Electric Cars
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million
    • Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?
    • This Waffle House Video Parody Nails 4 Keys to Great Employee Training. Here’s Why
    • Michael Saylor’s Strategy makes smallest Bitcoin purchase since mid-March
    • 5 Fastest-Charging Electric Cars
    • This All-Original, Class-Winning 1970 Shelby GT500 Fastback Is up for Grabs
    • Recycled Polyester Saved This American Factory. Environmentalists Hate It
    • I’m a Plus-size Travel Writer, and These Are the Dresses I’ll Be Wearing All Summer Long
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Supreme Court Restores Agency Deference In NEPA Reviews
    Legal

    Supreme Court Restores Agency Deference In NEPA Reviews

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Supreme Court Restores Agency Deference In NEPA Reviews
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    On May 29, 2025, the United States Supreme Court issued an 8-0 opinion in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al. v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al. that affirmed agency deference in review of environmental documents prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).[1] This important decision will bring much-needed certainty for project developers and financing agencies that should reduce permitting obstacles resulting in greater time and cost savings to developers.

    In approving an 88-mile railroad line in northeastern Utah, the Surface Transportation Board prepared a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) consisting of more than 3,600 pages and analyzing impacts to local wetlands, land use, and recreation. The EIS declined to analyze the potential effects of upstream oil and gas drilling or downstream oil refining as outside the Surface Transportation Board’s jurisdiction. On appeal, the D.C. Circuit vacated the approval of the railroad line, finding that the Surface Transportation Board failed to take the requisite “hard look” at all of the environmental impacts of the railway line as it impermissibly limited its analysis of upstream and downstream projects.[2]

    The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the D.C. Circuit and held that the Surface Transportation Board appropriately reviewed the environmental effects of the proposed railroad line under NEPA. The Court affirmed a number of important aspects of judicial review under NEPA:

    • NEPA is a procedural statute and simply prescribes the necessary process for an agency’s environmental review of a project;
    • Under NEPA, an agency’s only obligation is to prepare an adequate report and NEPA imposes no substantive constraints on the agency’s ultimate decision to approve a project;
    • A court’s review must be at its “most deferential” when reviewing the sufficiency of an agency’s analysis of project alternatives and environmental impacts; and
    • Agencies retain discretion to determine where to draw the line with respect to indirect impacts.

    In recent years, courts have “strayed and not applied NEPA with the level of deference demanded by the statutory text” and have “engaged in overly intrusive (and unpredictable) review in NEPA cases.”[3] The Court correctly notes that these court decisions “have slowed down or blocked many projects and, in turn, caused litigation-averse agencies to take ever more time and to prepare ever longer EISs for future projects.”[4]

    Energy infrastructure project developers have long faced substantial uncertainty with respect to court review of agency NEPA actions. Project costs have skyrocketed as opponents have weaponized NEPA to block the development of essential energy infrastructure. Today’s Supreme Court decision is a welcome and overdue affirmation of agency discretion.

    Footnotes

    [1] Seven Cty. Infrastructure Coalition, et al. v. Eagle Cty., Co., et al., No. 23-975 (May 29, 2025).

    [2] Eagle Cty. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 82 F.4th 1152, 1196 (2023).

    [3] Opinion at 12.

    [4] Id.

    Listen to this post 



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleA New York Financier Had the World’s Largest Stone Maze Built at This 280-Acre $10 Million Estate
    Next Article Banco Santander eyeing crypto expansion with fiat-backed stablecoin

    Related Posts

    Florida’s Proposed CHOICE Act to Add Significant Teeth to Enforcement of Non-compete Agreements

    June 23, 2025

    Latest In Supreme Court Opinions Reveal The Truth About Who The Justices Really Are – See Generally – Above the Law

    June 23, 2025

    USCIS Policy Alert: Derogatory Information Unknown to the Benefit Requestor

    June 22, 2025

    Beltway Buzz, June 20, 2025

    June 21, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    3 Mins Read

    A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million

    A scandal that Charles Dickens turned into fiction unfolded in a London pad that is…

    Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?

    June 23, 2025

    This Waffle House Video Parody Nails 4 Keys to Great Employee Training. Here’s Why

    June 23, 2025

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy makes smallest Bitcoin purchase since mid-March

    June 23, 2025
    Top
    Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    3 Mins Read

    A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million

    A scandal that Charles Dickens turned into fiction unfolded in a London pad that is…

    Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?

    June 23, 2025

    This Waffle House Video Parody Nails 4 Keys to Great Employee Training. Here’s Why

    June 23, 2025
    Our Picks
    Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    3 Mins Read

    A London Mansion With Ties to Charles Dickens Just Listed for $25 Million

    A scandal that Charles Dickens turned into fiction unfolded in a London pad that is…

    Finance & Investment
    6 Mins Read

    Military briefing: will Iran start a new ‘tanker war’?

    Mines across one of the world’s most strategically important waterways. Western-made missiles scuttling oil tankers…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version