Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    Client Challenge

    December 16, 2025

    MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago

    December 16, 2025

    Insurance moves at Starkweather & Shepley and Amica Mutual

    December 16, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • Client Challenge
    • MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago
    • Insurance moves at Starkweather & Shepley and Amica Mutual
    • Chickenpox in Adults: Risk Factors, Symptoms, Complications, Treatment
    • First-Year Law School Enrollees Increase 13% Since 2023| Law.com
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • Client Challenge
    • MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago
    • Insurance moves at Starkweather & Shepley and Amica Mutual
    • Chickenpox in Adults: Risk Factors, Symptoms, Complications, Treatment
    • First-Year Law School Enrollees Increase 13% Since 2023| Law.com
    • The Potato Board Is the Ultimate Crowd-Pleasing Appetizer This Holiday Season
    • Silksong is getting a free expansion next year
    • Trump open to reviewing pardon for Samourai Bitcoin app developer
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Legal - Court to hear case on racial discrimination in jury selection
    Legal

    Court to hear case on racial discrimination in jury selection

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Court to hear case on racial discrimination in jury selection
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The Supreme Court on Monday morning agreed to take up the case of a Mississippi man who contends that he was sentenced to death in violation of the Constitution’s ban on racial discrimination in jury selection. Pitchford v. Cain is the only case from the justices’ Dec. 12 conference in which they’ve granted review so far. The court did not act on several high-profile petitions that it considered last Friday, including challenges to state laws banning assault rifles and large-capacity magazines.

    Nearly two decades ago, Terry Pitchford was convicted and sentenced to death for his role in the shooting death of a shopkeeper. At his 2006 trial, the local district attorney, Doug Evans – whose conduct was at the center of another jury discrimination case six years ago – eliminated four potential jury members, all of whom were Black, over the objections of Pitchford’s lawyers. They contended that the strikes violated the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. Kentucky, holding that the use of peremptory challenges (that is, challenges for any reason) to remove potential jurors based on race violates the Constitution. The state trial judge rejected their argument.

    The Mississippi Supreme Court upheld Pitchford’s conviction and sentence. It reasoned that Pitchford had forfeited his right to make his Batson claim because he had not offered any arguments to rebut the race-neutral explanations that the prosecutor had offered for his strikes of the four potential Black jurors.

    When Pitchford went to federal court in Mississippi to seek post-conviction relief, U.S. District Judge Michael Mills granted that relief and ordered the state to either retry him within 180 days or release him.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed. In its view, Mills had rested his determination on his conclusion that the “the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in its waiver analysis because Pitchford sufficiently objected at the bench conference. But even assuming the district court was correct,” Judge Kyle Duncan wrote, “that would not entitle Pitchford to habeas relief” because the standard under the federal law governing post-conviction claims is whether the state supreme court’s decision was “an ‘objectively unreasonable’ application of a Supreme Court ‘holding[].’”

    Pitchford came to the Supreme Court in May, asking the justices to weigh in. After considering his petition for review at eight consecutive conferences, the court agreed to do so. They framed the question before them as whether, under the federal law governing post-conviction claims for relief, the Mississippi Supreme Court’s determination that Pitchford had waived his right to rebut the prosecutor’s asserted race-neutral reasons for exercising peremptory strikes against four Black jurors was unreasonable.

    The case will likely be argued in March or April, with a decision to follow by late June or early July.

    Additionally, on Monday morning the court denied review in Scullark v. Iowa, in which an Iowa man who was arrested when police came to investigate a domestic violence call had asked the justices to rule on the thorny issue of how broadly police officers can search when they make an arrest. Patrick Scullark, Jr., removed a fanny pack from around his waist and handed it to a companion. A police officer searched the fanny pack, in which he found methamphetamine. Scullark contended that the search violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment, but the justices on Monday declined to take up his appeal.

    And in Kane v. City of New York, the court turned down a request to intervene in a challenge to the scope of religious exemptions from New York City’s vaccine mandate for educators. The case was brought by staff whose opposition to the mandate stems from their personal religious beliefs, rather than those of the religious organizations to which they belong; they argued that the mandate scheme discriminates on the basis of religion.

    The justices’ next regularly scheduled conference will take place on Friday, Jan. 9.

    Cases: Pitchford v. Cain, Kane v. City of New York, Scullark v. Iowa

    Recommended Citation:
    Amy Howe,
    Court to hear case on racial discrimination in jury selection,
    SCOTUSblog (Dec. 15, 2025, 1:43 PM),
    https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/court-to-hear-case-on-racial-discrimination-in-jury-selection/



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleConduent data breach affected 10.5 million, included SSNs
    Next Article What Is a Background Check Subscription and How Does It Work?

    Related Posts

    First-Year Law School Enrollees Increase 13% Since 2023| Law.com

    December 16, 2025

    ‘You Can See the Concern?’: DC Circuit Hears Argument Over Trump’s Bid to End Most Federal Workers’ Bargaining Rights| Law.com

    December 16, 2025

    Artificial Intelligence Smart Glasses Compliance Concerns

    December 15, 2025

    Tracking Biglaw Bonuses And War Crimes – See Generally – Above the Law

    December 15, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago

    December 16, 2025

    Insurance moves at Starkweather & Shepley and Amica Mutual

    December 16, 2025

    Chickenpox in Adults: Risk Factors, Symptoms, Complications, Treatment

    December 16, 2025
    Top
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago

    December 16, 2025

    Insurance moves at Starkweather & Shepley and Amica Mutual

    December 16, 2025
    Our Picks
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    2 Mins Read

    MetaMask adds Bitcoin support after teasing it 10 months ago

    Crypto wallet giant MetaMask has announced it has added support for Bitcoin, hinting that more…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version