The discount brokerage contends that a three-judge panel erred in finding that NAR’s no-commingling rule was not direct evidence of “concerted action” between NAR and Zillow.
Source link
Trending
- Heads or Tails? The Double-Sided Fashion Coin of Milan
- Oracle Stock Is Down But Not For Long (NYSE:ORCL)
- JW Anderson CEO Jenny Galimberti Steered the Year’s Biggest Rebrand—Here’s How
- Client Challenge
- Dr. Simone Reveals Where She and Cecil Stand After Her Shocking Divorce Comment (EXCLUSIVE) | Bravo
- We Asked Cleaning Pros What Minimalists Throw Away Every Week—and They Named These 8 Things
- Etsy Quirks Lead to Shipping Questions
- Google pulls AI-generated videos of Disney characters from YouTube in response to cease and desist
