Close Menu
Global News HQ
    What's Hot

    Client Challenge

    November 25, 2025

    Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal

    November 25, 2025

    Mamdani Taps Cozen Lawyer for Transition Team| Law.com

    November 25, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • Client Challenge
    • Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal
    • Mamdani Taps Cozen Lawyer for Transition Team| Law.com
    • How a turntable changed my family’s relationship to music and quality time
    • 7 Common Winter Home Items That Could Be Fire Hazards
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    Trending
    • Client Challenge
    • Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal
    • Mamdani Taps Cozen Lawyer for Transition Team| Law.com
    • How a turntable changed my family’s relationship to music and quality time
    • 7 Common Winter Home Items That Could Be Fire Hazards
    • Amazon's 2025 Black Friday deals are shockingly good: Shop some of my favorites up to 60% off
    • What Psoriatic Arthritis Symptoms Feel Like
    • It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s the most expensive comic book ever sold
    Global News HQ
    • Technology & Gadgets
    • Travel & Tourism (Luxury)
    • Health & Wellness (Specialized)
    • Home Improvement & Remodeling
    • Luxury Goods & Services
    • Home
    • Finance & Investment
    • Insurance
    • Legal
    • Real Estate
    • More
      • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
      • E-commerce & Retail
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Automotive (Car Deals & Maintenance)
    Global News HQ
    Home - Finance & Investment - When Checkout Charity Gets Uncomfortable — and Maybe Even Illegal
    Finance & Investment

    When Checkout Charity Gets Uncomfortable — and Maybe Even Illegal

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    When Checkout Charity Gets Uncomfortable — and Maybe Even Illegal
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    When was the last time that you were paying for your groceries or other items, and the cashier asked, “Would you like to round up your total for charity?” Perhaps they didn’t tell you which charity. Or maybe they simply asked, “Would you like to round it up?”

    That’s what “Sylvia” and her mother encountered at a home decor chain store that sells bedding, kitchenware and holiday goods.

    “After all of our items were rung up, my mom paid in cash, and then the cashier said, ‘Would you like to round it up?’ Mom said, ‘Sure, no worry. There is a shortage of pennies. That’s fine. We don’t need them.'”

    From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance

    Be a smarter, better informed investor.

    CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE

    Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters

    Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.

    Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.


    Kiplinger’s Adviser Intel, formerly known as Building Wealth, is a curated network of trusted financial professionals who share expert insights on wealth building and preservation. Contributors, including fiduciary financial planners, wealth managers, CEOs and attorneys, provide actionable advice about retirement planning, estate planning, tax strategies and more. Experts are invited to contribute and do not pay to be included, so you can trust their advice is honest and valuable.


    “At home, we were reviewing the receipt and saw that the last entry was a 32-cent payment to St. Jude (Children’s Research Hospital). Totally unexpected! We had made a charitable donation without realizing it.

    “We don’t object to the donation, but we feel we were misled because we weren’t informed where our money would go and therefore didn’t give our consent.

    “I think this is something you might look into, Mr. Beaver. How widespread a practice is this?”

    They were indeed misled

    Sylvia is right. They were misled, and with Sylvia on the line, I confirmed it by speaking with the on-duty manager at the store, asking her, “Do you have a charity campaign for St. Jude?”

    “Yes, we do.”

    “Do your cashiers tell customers that ’rounding up’ their total means that their change goes to St. Jude? Or do they just say, ‘Would you like to round it up?'”

    She refused to answer but insisted that Sylvia tell her who the cashier was. “Give me the register number on the receipt.”

    I repeated my question, which she still didn’t answer. I took her refusal as an admission that, yes, cashiers ask customers if they want to round up their total without letting them know where their money will go.

    Of course, who can forget the past few years of constantly being bombarded with “Would you like to give a dollar to XYZ organization?”

    But we don’t hear that much anymore, because “checkout charity” has been replaced with the “round it up” verbiage.

    Perfect example of impulse giving

    America is a generous nation. If you look at the Charities Aid Foundation’s World Giving Index, the United States ranks near the top of countries whose citizens are among the most generous on the planet.

    Now, there is giving when you know where your gift is going and you want to donate, but snookering us to give even a few cents to an unidentified cause is more than not acceptable. It is generally considered illegal to solicit charitable donations without revealing the name of the charity and the purpose for which the funds are being raised.

    Both federal and state laws require transparency in charitable solicitations to protect the public from fraud.

    And when it happens at the checkout counter, the customer has only seconds to decide.

    In any other business or commercial setting, we would say, “Wait a minute, I have some questions.”

    But when people waiting behind us in line are close enough to hear our conversation with the cashier, the result is pressure — you are being pressured to give your money (i.e., make a buying decision with no time to think it over) to an organization that might not have been identified.

    After asking if you’d like to donate, the cashier should say, “And your donation goes to XYZ.”

    But that’s not always so, according to the 2025 Charity Checkout Champions Report by Engage for Good and presented by Adyen, which analyzed 92 point-of-sale (POS) fundraising campaigns that raised over $275 million in 2024. The report found that only 74% of the campaigns clearly identified the benefiting charity.


    Looking for expert tips to grow and preserve your wealth? Sign up for Adviser Intel (formerly known as Building Wealth), our free, twice-weekly newsletter.


    I spoke to an executive of one of the North American companies that helps businesses collect donations for charities at checkout. He asked that he and his employer not be identified because the information he shared with me is more frank than his employer would prefer. Once I promised not to share his identity, he was quick to admit:

    “We show cashiers how to seize on a customer’s psychologically weak moment, when their donation could be going to a group they might not approve of and would never give their money to.

    “But impulse giving is huge in the charity business, and so your very presence in the checkout line lends itself to being pressured into making a split-second decision for an altruistic reason.

    “Unless full disclosure is made about the recipient of the donation, this is highly unethical, but (businesses get) away with it all the time.”

    Findings on impulse giving

    Fifty-three percent of Americans donate impulsively at the checkout counter, according to a 2024 survey conducted by Binghamton University researchers. They found:

    • Impulse giving is often driven by social pressure, emotional appeal and the ease of the transaction.
    • The donation request is embedded in a moment of financial exchange, making it feel like a small, convenient act of generosity.
    • Many consumers report feeling guilty or obligated when prompted, especially in face-to-face retail settings.
    • Younger customers are more likely to give impulsively than older people.

    What businesses should do

    The executive I spoke with offered these suggestions to help retailers that adopt checkout-charity programs do everything correctly and steer clear of trouble:

    1. Name and describe the charitable organization.

    • The name and purpose of the charity should be clearly displayed at the checkout
    • You should verify that it is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit

    2. Provide an explanation for how customers’ funds will be used.

    • Include administrative or processing fees
    • Break down how much goes directly to the cause

    3. Ensure funds are given voluntarily and that informed consent is obtained.

    • Your workers should make it clear that the donation is optional
    • Customers should be told that they can decline
    • Your workers should not use language that invokes pressure or guilt

    The executive concluded our interview with these cautionary words for retail businesses: “Checkout charity is highly effective, and at the same time, we are hearing more and more objections to the pressure to donate. My fear is this has the potential to backfire one day.”

    All that said, checkout charity isn’t a bad thing when it’s done right. According to a Charity Watch blog, checkout donations allow charities, especially smaller ones, to raise significant amounts of money from a much larger pool of donors than they could normally reach. And because the process is part of a transaction that’s already being conducted, the fundraising expenses are much lower.

    So the bottom line here is that shoppers should make sure that they are aware of what they’re donating to before they hand over even a small donation at the checkout. Here’s what you can do if you encounter a request to round up your total:

    • If the cashier isn’t clear about what the money will be used for, ask.
    • Don’t hesitate to ask further questions about the charity. Maybe it’s one you’d be happy to support.
    • If you’re not interested or feel there isn’t enough information available, simply and politely say, “No, thank you” or “Not today.”

    Dennis Beaver practices law in Bakersfield, Calif., and welcomes comments and questions from readers, which may be faxed to (661) 323-7993, or e-mailed to Lagombeaver1@gmail.com. And be sure to visit dennisbeaver.com.

    Related Content

    This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleSpanx Founder Sara Blakely Swears These 7 Words Built Her Success—and Most Leaders Avoid Them
    Next Article Texas appeals court upholds TWIA rule on assessment-year market share

    Related Posts

    Client Challenge

    November 25, 2025

    Ellsworth Growth And Income Fund Q3 2025 Commentary (ECF)

    November 25, 2025

    Opinion | Pepper…and Salt

    November 25, 2025

    Opinion | The Gang That Couldn’t Indict Straight

    November 25, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    ads
    Don't Miss
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal

    November 25, 2025

    Mamdani Taps Cozen Lawyer for Transition Team| Law.com

    November 25, 2025

    How a turntable changed my family’s relationship to music and quality time

    November 25, 2025
    Top
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal

    November 25, 2025

    Mamdani Taps Cozen Lawyer for Transition Team| Law.com

    November 25, 2025
    Our Picks
    Finance & Investment
    1 Min Read

    Client Challenge

    Client Challenge JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Please enable JavaScript to proceed. A required…

    Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    3 Mins Read

    Bitcoin Targets $96K-$99K Recovery as Indices Signal Reversal

    Current fair value sits near $99,000, framing a potential recovery target in the $96,000–$99,000…

    Pages
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Homepage
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    © 2025 Global News HQ .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version